ParlovaStart for free →
📚 PhilosophyTerminalePremière⏱ 45 min

Educational Activity: Dialogue with Socrates in Class

A session to practice maieutics and question students' certainties

🏛️
Athens · 399 BC
Socrates
Format: Individual or pair work on Parlova
Group size: Whole class — 25 to 35 students
Curriculum: Terminale Philosophy Program — Knowledge / Truth / Justice

Learning objectives

📖Knowledge
  • The Socratic Method: Maieutics, Philosophical Irony, and Dialectics
  • The main themes of Socrates' philosophy: virtue, knowledge, justice, soul
  • The context of Socrates' trial in Athens (399 BC) and its political stakes
  • The distinction between knowledge (episteme) and opinion (doxa) in Greek thought
🛠️Skills
  • Practice philosophical questioning with an interlocutor who turns the questions back
  • Distinguish true knowledge from opinion in an argued discourse
  • Formulate a philosophical problem from a vague intuition
  • Confront one's own conception of virtue, justice, or happiness with counterexamples
🧠Critical thinking
  • Understand what 'I know that I know nothing' implies as an epistemological stance
  • Question the legitimacy of a democracy that condemns freedom of thought to death
  • Evaluate the tension between obedience to laws and fidelity to one's convictions
  • Distinguish the sources on Socrates (Plato, Xenophon, Aristophanes) and their biases

Recommended level (French system)

Terminale
High School
Première
High School

Curriculum reference: Terminale Philosophy Program — Knowledge / Truth / Justice

Lesson plan

Total time: 45 minutes

📖8 min
Phase 1 —Introduction

Present Socrates in 399 BC: he has just been sentenced to death by Athenian democracy for impiety and corrupting the youth. He refuses to flee. Reminder: he never wrote anything — everything comes from Plato. Distribute the timeline and the main notions of the trial.

💬22 min
Phase 2 —Dialogue with Socrates

Students question Socrates on Parlova. Encourage questions that force Socrates to define a concept (virtue, justice, soul) — then give a concrete example. Socrates will often respond with a question. The teacher can play devil's advocate and challenge the answers.

🔍10 min
Phase 3 —Collective Deconstruction

What does Socrates say about virtue? Justice? Death? Identify how he systematically turns questions back. Build on the board the structure of a Socratic reasoning: definition → counterexample → reformulation → new definition.

⚖️5 min
Phase 4 —Philosophical Assessment

Each student formulates in one sentence: 'After this dialogue, I know that I still don't know…'. This Socratic formulation forces a personal synthesis. Open up to the notion of a philosophical essay as a written extension of maieutics.

Suggested questions

12 questions ready to use in class — students can also come up with their own.

1

What is virtue? Give me a definition that applies to all cases.

2

You say 'I know that I know nothing' — but then, why do you spend your life questioning others?

3

What is justice? Is it just that Athenian democracy condemns you to death?

4

You refuse to flee before your trial. Isn't that sacrificing your life for an idea?

5

How do you distinguish what we truly know from what we think we know?

6

Can virtue be taught — or are we born virtuous, or do we become so through experience?

7

What is the soul? How is it different from the body? Does it survive death?

8

Athenian democracy has condemned you. Do you still believe it is the best political system?

9

Your students — Alcibiades betrayed Athens, others went astray. Is that your failure?

10

Why have you never written anything? Aren't you afraid your thought will disappear with you?

11

What is happiness — and must one be just to be happy?

12

If you could start over, would you do anything differently? Or does philosophy leave you no choice?

Skills practised

Questioning
Formulate precise philosophical questions from an intuition or a certainty to be deconstructed.
Conceptual Analysis
Break down a notion (virtue, justice, happiness) by distinguishing its particular cases and contradictions.
Critical Thinking
Identify the paradoxes of Socratic discourse and its implications for political and moral thought.
Argumentation
Defend a position on knowledge or justice against an interlocutor who turns the arguments back.
🔧 Adapt this activity to your class

From your teacher area, duplicate this activity to adapt it: add your own teaching documents (PDF, textbook extract…) — Socrates will rely on them and quote the exact passage to the student — and choose a reliability level for the AI: Restricted, Semi-restricted or Open. A blank student worksheet, without the answers, can still be printed separately for the lesson.

Create my custom version →
🖨️ Printable version
Print this sheet or save it as a PDF from your browser (File → Print → Save as PDF).

Launch this activity on Parlova

Socrates answers your students' questions in real time. Nothing to install, no subscription to get started.

Start for free →
Similar activities
🛋️
Sigmund Freud
Première, Terminale
⚡
Zeus
6e, 5e
Related characters
🛋️
Sigmund Freud
Vienna, 1900
📋
25 questions to ask →
Related topics
Philosophy →Ancient Greece →All activities →